Allen, D. (1978). Structure and creativity in religion hermeneutics in Mircea Eliade’s phenomenology and new directions. The Hague [u.a.]: Mouton. In Rennie, B. (Ed.) 2006. Mircea Eliade: a critical reader. London; Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.

Alles, G. D. (1988). Wach, Eliade, and the Critique from Totality. Numen, 35(1), 108-138.

Bilimoria, P. (2000). A subaltern/postcolonial critique of the comparative philosophy of religion. Sophia, 39(1), 171-207.

Christ, C. P. (1991). Mircea Eliade and the Feminist Paradigm Shift. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 7(2), 75-94.

Dudley, Guilford, III. (1976). Mircea Eliade as the “Anti-Historian” of Religions. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 44, no. 2 (June): 345-359.

Errington, J. (2001). Colonial Linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 19-39.

Foucault, M. (1967). Nietzsche, Freud, Marx in Nietzsche cahiers de Royaumont. Philosophie nVI. Ed. de Minuit.

Holmes, J., and M. Meyerhoff. (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28, no. 02: 173–183.

Irvine, J. T. & Gal, S. (2000). Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. (Ed.), Regimes of language : ideologies, polities, and identities, (pp. 35-83). Santa Fe, NM; Oxford: School of American Research Press; J. Currey.

Joy, M. . (2001). Postcolonial Reflections: Challenges for Religious Studies. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 13, 177-195.

Kehoe, A. B. (1996). Eliade and Hultkrantz: The European Primitivism Tradition. American Indian Quarterly, 20(3/4), 377-392.

King, U. (2002). Essay. Is there a future for religious studies as we know it? Some postmodern, feminist, and spiritual challenges. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 70(2), 365-388.

Leach, E. (1966). Sermons by a Man on a Ladder. New York Review of Books: 28–31. In Rennie, B. (Ed.) 2006. Mircea Eliade: a critical reader. London; Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.

Masuzawa, T., (2005). The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Olson, C. . (1999). Mircea Eliade, Postmodernism, and the Problematic Nature of Representational Thinking. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 11, 357-385.

Rennie, B. (2006). Mircea Eliade : a critical reader. London; Oakville CT: Equinox Pub.

- (2000). A Response To Carl Olson’s “Mircea Eliade, Postmodernism, and the Problematic Nature of Representational Thinking”. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 12, 416-421.

Segal, R. A., & Wiebe, D. (1989). Axioms and Dogmas in the Study of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 57(3), 591-605.

Smart, N. (1978). Beyond Eliade: The Future of Theory in Religion. Numen, 25(2), 171-183.

Soucy, A. (2009). Language, Orthodoxy, and Performances of Authority in Vietnamese Buddhism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, lfp017.

Strenski, I. (1973). Mircea Eliade: Some Theoretical Problems. The Theory of Myth: Six Studies: 40–78. In Rennie, B. (Ed.) 2006. Mircea Eliade: a critical reader. London; Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.

Werblowsky, RJZ. (1989). ” In nostro tempore”. On Mircea Eliade. Religion (London. 1971) 19, no. 2: 129–136. In Rennie, B. (Ed.) 2006. Mircea Eliade: a critical reader. London; Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.

Whorf, Benjamin. (1944). The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to # Language. ETC. 1, no. 1: 197-215.